No harmonica lessons for the PKK

Back in February Kurdistan Commentary reported on a US Supreme Court case that involved the PKK. The case went to court later that month and today the Supreme Court upheld a US federal law that bars ‘material support’ to foreign terrorist organisations.

The thrust of the argument was freedom of speech vs. anti-terrorism laws. Free speech lost as the court ruled 6-3 that the government may prohibit all forms of aid to designated terrorist groups, even if the support consists of training and advice about entirely peaceful and legal activities. During arguments in February, Justice Sotomayor wondered whether the material support statute was so vague that ‘teaching these members to play the harmonica would be unlawful.’ Justice Scalia quickly responded that a group of terrorists in a ‘harmonica quartet might tour the [U.S.] and make a lot of money.’ And that was the core of the debate.  And now, it seems, there will be no harmonica lessons for members of the PKK.

Under current U.S. law there is no legal way to aid terrorist organisations, even if the aid is intended to convince the terrorist organisations not to be terrorist organisations anymore, because what if that aid somehow winds up helping them continue to be terrorist organisations? To wit, as Scalia argued, if you teach them to play the harmonica, they will quickly form a quartet, raise money, and fund their terrorist activities.

Kimberly Curtis of the FPA Human Rights blog wrote:

If it is the methods of terrorism that we are so against, then efforts to get terrorist organisations to disarm and pursue their agendas politically should be encouraged. If the pen is to be mightier than the sword, then we must preserve a place for people to talk.

Well, the court has now gone so far in its criminalisation of speech activity that those places for people to talk are quickly evaporating. ‘Aid and assistance’ to terrorist organisations can also be in the form of an op-ed essay written on behalf of a designated terrorist group. What might this mean for bloggers? What happens if you suggest that the PKK has the right to armed struggle against Turkish oppressors? What if you re-publish an interview with Murat Karayilan? Is this ‘material support’?

Three of the Court’s liberal-leaning Justices (Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor) filed a strongly worded dissent, and Justice Stephen Breyer took the somewhat unusual step of reading aloud the dissent from the bench.

Speaking of the aid groups that filed the motion, Breyer said their mission is ‘entirely peaceful and consists only of political speech, including how to petition the U.N.’

‘Not even the serious and deadly problem of international terrorism can require automatic forfeiture of First Amendment rights,’ he added.

Of note is that Elena Kagan, who argued on behalf of the government back in February, is now Obama’s nominee for Supreme Court Justice.


Grace, Rob. Teaching Terrorists to Play the Harmonica. Foreign Policy Blogs, 26 February 2010.

Center for Constitutional Rights, Arguments on Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.

Denniston, Lyle. Analysis: Partial U.S. victory on terrorism, 21 June 2010.

The PKK, US Supreme Court, and freedom of speech. Kurdistan Commentary, 19 February 2010.

1 thought on “No harmonica lessons for the PKK

  1. Ok first of all, the PKK will never ever use peaceful civilized methods. They always want to use violence and you cannot trust any of their organizations or affiliates, whether if it is BDP, DTP, KCK, Roj TV or anything of that sort. I am not excusing Turkey on the past handlings on the Kurdish issues, but there are many Kurdish rights groups and organizations who are against not only PKK’s violent methods, but they also criticise Turkey’s past record on Kurdish issues.

    Also, to claim that the Turkish government and the majority of Turkish society labels Kurds as “terrorists” is simply downright wrong if you ask me. The Turkish government and society as a whole distinguish the fringe margin of PKK supporters from normal everyday Kurds, which over 90% of proud Turkish citizens of Kurdish heritage renounce the barbaric practices of the PKK terror group.

    Here is the real face of the PKK: (PKK’s role in the international drug trade) (Communist PKK flag) (Part Of Article States the PKK had ties with the Soviets, as well as the Iranian Ayatollahs, both in the times of Turkey’s Secular and Religious Eras) (Joseph Stallin supporters support PKK terror) (US imposes sanctions on PKK leaders for drug trafficing) (Must read book)

    By the way to anyone who is going to call me racist, I am not a racist but I support Turkey finding an acceptable solution to this Kurdish issue, but the PKK is a violent seperatist group who wants to create a Communist-ruled country in the Southeast of Anatolia. The Kurdish community needs to find groups that are less violent, less communist and make sure that the BDP, PKK, KCK fall.
    People know the tricks and lies and foolishness of the BDP, PKK and KCK. They are all interconnected and they cannot play games, fool the world, or pull of nice tricks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s