New report: Preventing Conflict Over Kurdistan

A new [US] administration has to manage the Kurdish questions as a critical element of its Iraq disengagement policy. Washington must pay close attention to the many intertwined dimensions of the Kurdish question.

-Henri Barkey, “Preventing Conflict Over Kurdistan”, report by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

from the Carnegie website:

coverThe invasion of Iraq has surfaced long-suppressed nationalist aspirations among the Kurds, most notably the emergence of the federal Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). If ignored or mishandled, Kurdish aspirations have the potential to ignite violence and instability in Iraq, as well as the region, at a particularly delicate time, a new report by the Carnegie Endowment concludes.

Henri Barkey calls for renewed attention to the Kurdish issue to prevent conflict and prescribes a fresh U.S. approach. The United States must move quickly—as American forces withdraw from Iraq, U.S. influence in the region will wane.

U.S. policy recommendations:

  • Break the deadlock between the Iraqi government and the KRG over oil and gas revenue sharing and refugee resettlement. This will go a long way toward rebuilding trust and preventing Kirkuk from becoming a flashpoint—the first priority for the United States.
  • Continue to support the federal system outlined in Iraq’s constitution and avoid any suggestion that Iraq be partitioned.
  • Solidify the dialogue between Turkey and the KRG through U.S. involvement. Warming relations between Turkey and the KRG would stabilize the region and aid in a smooth U.S. troop withdrawal.
  • Demobilize the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and encourage its fighters to disarm or defect under a joint political and military effort coordinated by the KRG, Turkey, and the United States.
  • Work with European allies to resolve Turkey’s internal Kurdish disputes. Supporting Turkey’s counterterrorism program and its bid for EU accession, and providing development assistance in Turkey’s Kurdish regions would allow the U.S. and Europe to address problems from both sides.

Barkey concludes:

“The United States has to take the lead, because it remains, despite its mistakes, the only power with the requisite capacities to cajole, convince, and pressure governments and groups to act. Left to their own devices, none of the parties has shown much ability to move forward, even if the right ideas and solutions are apparent, or sustain progress once achieved. The United States can approach matters with a broader outlook and vision concerning the linkages among the issues, attributes often missing in local parties.”

The full report (.pdf, 3.9MB) can be downloaded here: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/preventing_conflict_kurdistan.pdf

To address the Kurdish issue and the role the United States can play in preventing conflict, Carnegie’s Henri Barkey; Kurdistan Regional Government representative Qubad Talabani; and the German Marshall Fund’s Ian Lesser discussed Barkey’s report “Preventing Conflict Over Kurdistan”. Marina Ottaway moderated the discussion.  Watch video of event.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s